Scusi? It's you, *not* me, who reflected on what she wrote -- BULLET IN BOARD

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:01 07/09/24 Sat
Author: Colin Wisbey
Author Host/IP: n175-39-135-218.meb4.vic.optusnet.com.au / 175.39.135.218
Subject: Scusi? It's you, *not* me, who reflected on what she wrote
In reply to: Pyeman WPBD 's message, "Which part of her story do you know she's right about or hasn't embellished" on 10:35 07/09/24 Sat

I have no knowledge whatsoever about how factual her article is.

Hence, I had no informed opinion to offer so, unlike your good self, I passed no opinion, positive or negative or other, about the credibility of what she wrote.

It's simple: I read the article with interest, albeit a disappointing reflection of our club's professionalism in those matters if true.

You chose to respond to her article by strongly implying it was not factually correct.

Like other EBnWers, of course I'm very keen to know what is true, untrue or embellished in her article.

Hence I merely asked you what you believe to be untrue / embellished. Simple question.

Your response, namely

>"Which part of her story do you know she's right about or hasn't embellished. You want to die on the Caroline Wilson hill then you really have lost the plot Colin"

is not only completely spurious but seems bizarre, given that I expressed absolutely no opinion whatsoever about either the article or Wilson.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

So what you're saying is you fell for it, a Caro hatchet job with liberal amounts of mayonnaise applied -- Pyeman WPBD, 14:35 07/09/24 Sat
- Really? What part of "I have no knowledge whatsoever about how factual her article is" confused you? (NT) -- Colin Wisbey, 16:30 07/09/24 Sat

Forum timezone: GMT+9
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.