VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345678910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 19:48 19/09/24 Thu
Author: Annabelle
Author Host/IP: 139-216-204-154.sta.dodo.net.au / 139.216.204.154
Subject: Two of the highest paid players in the top 100 is not right. If the AFL is serious
In reply to: Member2025 's message, "Is anyone else" on 23:05 18/09/24 Wed

it would say to the Cats since you keep spruiking your lifestyle advantage we will lower your salary cap.

Why is this fair?

Clubs like Collingwood et al have had a soft cap placed on their spending to stymie their financial advantage and their contributions through big crowds have been sliced up among the rest of the competition.

Geelong has the only real home ground advantage in Victoria, and a lifestyle advantage which appears to make them a destination club where players are allegedly playing for less money.

How can we have an 'even' comp as is the AFL's wont when one club has an overt advantage?

What usually happens is the clamsps go on this type of club.

Does the AFL want Geelong to be a club that's in the eight every yeawr seemingly defying gravity albeit through means others can't match?

Other so-called powerhouses have been hobbled so why not them>?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:



Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
* Message subject (required):

* Name (required):

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:

Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.


Forum timezone: GMT+9
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.