Are you suggesting we go wtih Cox instead? Or no third tall? -- BULLET IN BOARD

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:54 17/12/24 Tue
Author: Cakewalk
Author Host/IP: 61-69-152-88.static.tpgi.com.au / 61.69.152.88
Subject: Are you suggesting we go wtih Cox instead? Or no third tall?
In reply to: Rizonico 's message, "Membrey is depth" on 11:33 17/12/24 Tue

Seems a waste to have Membrey as depth only. Especially if we're running with Cox in his place. Membreys stats are almost identical to Mihocek and McStay. McStay could offer ruck support.

That, imo, would make our forward line more dangerous than if Cox were playing that role. The ruck support, perhaps a little weaker, but not by a significant amount.

Nice problem to have in any case. We've been crying out for KPF depth for years.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Agree Cakewalk. -- Josh, 16:53 17/12/24 Tue
- I wouldn't be judicious having big Dan coming off an acl getting involved with more ruckwork -- Pyeman WPBD, 15:45 18/12/24 Wed
  - Fair point -- Cakewalk, 07:10 19/12/24 Thu
    - I reckon Cox is a better second ruck than McStay anyway and -- collingwoodj, 13:08 21/12/24 Sat
      - He is but he's not a better forward than Membrey -- Cakewalk, 17:53 21/12/24 Sat
So far nobody apart from the rucks have been doing ruck work -- Jen2310, 15:58 18/12/24 Wed
- Pity Head Office didn't scrap the sub and just go with 5 on the bench... -- rooka..., 17:21 18/12/24 Wed
  - Agree, can't play them all -- Cakewalk, 07:09 19/12/24 Thu
    - Depends if we only play Moore and Howe as the tall backs -- Tim, 07:30 19/12/24 Thu
      - All our talls bar Darcy are over 30 now, yeah? -- Geek, 11:10 20/12/24 Fri
        Yep. Plus we could potentially swing membrey and brody back if needed (NT) -- Tim, 17:54 20/12/24 Fri
  - I agree, nobody likes the sub rules apart from the afl. -- Jen2310, 15:29 19/12/24 Thu
  - Rooka .. well said 5 main interchange would have helped Cox.. Membrey -- Pendles Boys, 21:15 21/12/24 Sat
- That's good news (NT) -- Pyeman WPBD, 17:55 18/12/24 Wed
  - Which team other than Freo plays two rucks? -- Thommo, 12:31 20/12/24 Fri
    - The current depth of experienced players is excellent -- Rusty, 08:43 22/12/24 Sun
    - We'll need to play it by ear. -- JtP, 11:03 22/12/24 Sun

Forum timezone: GMT+10
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.