Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct: 
Feedback: 
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
| [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ] |
| Subject: Re: it was proved several years ago that wages for civil service had caught up with private enterprise | |
|
Author: Duncan7 |
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 22:48:09 07/20/07 Fri In reply to: Bev 's message, "it was proved several years ago that wages for civil service had caught up with private enterprise" on 17:40:28 07/20/07 Fri Who proved what? Teaching was one of the lowest paying jobs I ever had. You are so far off it isn't even funny. Keep telling yourself your little fantasies. Someone like you is better off that way. > and they are ahead in wages now due to the fact most >workers wages with the exception of civil service have >not had raises the past few years. Let me give you a >couple examples. when the state of wa advertises for >ferry workers the line is blocks long and some bring >sleeping bags to spend the night to get in line first. >The reason for this is not only are the wages great >but the perks are great also . I have a cousin who is >brilliant he taught at a prestigeous private college >here in the nw. He quit and went to work for the state >as the wages were better and the perks great. so do >not give me the old dog and pony excuse is you got >more perks because you took less wages. Oh another >case in point other than hired mercenaries in iraq who >do you know in private enterprise that makes 150 000 a >year for being a security guard . some patrolmen in >seattle make that much plus all the perks. wa state >workers after a few years with sick leave, paid >holidays , and paid vacations only work 9 1/2 months a >year. However you cut it up you are getting health >care paid for by the tax payer and it would behoove >you not to be so against others getting it .I do not >care that you get health care supported by tax payers >but think the hypocrisy on your part is rotten . [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] |