Re: How Can Paul Hong Say This With a Straight Face? -- RSQUBF discussion forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 17:47:55 06/02/04 Wed
Author: Bob
Subject: Re: How Can Paul Hong Say This With a Straight Face?
In reply to: Brian K 's message, "Re: How Can Paul Hong Say This With a Straight Face?" on 15:47:06 06/02/04 Wed

Brian, how about reading the content of the article. Some main points are the following;

1. history of abuse allegations
2. banned from campuses
3. Samuel Lee ruled "much like a tyrant"
4. "controlled by their shepherds through manipulative and
coercive tactics and allegedly abused".

Most people on this forum would agree that these things are true. The article does not lend itself to defining UBF as benign cult. No, UBF is shown to be a harmful cult. And the Toledo UBF has harmed people too. How can you have such great respect for Paul Hong when he has systematically hurt so many people, including me and my family? Huh?

>Read the cultnews disclaimer:
>
>This news page is about groups, organizations or
>movements, which may have been "cults" and/or
>"cult-like" in some way, shape or form. But not all
>groups called either "cults" or "cult-like" are
>harmful. Instead, they may be benign and generally
>defined as simply people intensely devoted to a
>person, place or thing. Therefore, the discussion or
>mention of a group, organization or person on this
>page, is not necessarily meant pejoratively.
>
>>And is rel=nofollow target=_blank >>href=http://rsqubf.fortunecity.net/documents/external/
>e
>>xternal.html>this or rel=nofollow target=_blank >>href=http://www.cultnews.com/archives/000746.html>this
><
>>a/> the result of a vast anti-UBF "conspiracy?"

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Objectivity -- Mike K., 02:39:14 06/03/04 Thu