VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345678910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 02:39:14 06/03/04 Thu
Author: Mike K.
Subject: Objectivity
In reply to: Bob 's message, "Re: How Can Paul Hong Say This With a Straight Face?" on 17:47:55 06/02/04 Wed

I'm afraid that Bob is right, UBF isn't listed there as a "potentially cultic" group, but if you read the associated articles, it becomes obvious that there's no conjunctive form implied.
Like there's the saying "Where there's a fire, there is smoke" - the website lists all "smoke" they can detect, which doesn't necessarily constitute a fire. But IF they say "There's actually a fire going on there", it's useless to argue that it's all about the smoke.

In Christ,
Mike K.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]



Forum timezone: GMT-6
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.