Re: recruits, talent - NCAA days are gone -- CROSSPORTS: Holy Cross Crusaders Sports Message Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Tuesday, April 29, 01:09:55pm [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8], 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11:08:39 06/10/04 Thu
Author: HC - middle of the PL pack at best
Subject: Re: recruits, talent - NCAA days are gone
In reply to: Rick 's message, "Re: recruits, talent - Curious" on 10:50:45 06/10/04 Thu

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> Re: recruits, talent - Curious -- Curious, 21:52:45 06/10/04 Thu

The fact that he's 5'10'' 155 lbs is not important. What is important is that he performed very well last summer and caught the interest of a number of programs. You can't judge a recruit's worth based on his height and weight, but his game.

If Clifford were polished at 6'10'' 260 lbs, he'd being going to the Big East. Kids with that kind of size and reasonable skills are few and far between. Again, another kid who played well last summer and is well-regarded. He'll be a good kid to work with in the PL.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> To: Curious -- Rick, 13:56:46 06/11/04 Fri

Again, I hope I'm wrong....

I think you may have missed my main point.

Given our 3-straight PL titles and 3-straight NCAA trips where we aquitted ourselves well versus national powers in Kentucky, Kansas and Marquette and add in the victory over BC at the Centrum and even our showing on the road versus Louisville - all that in sum over the past 3-4 years - has the talent level of our recruits improved markedly ? Have we taken advantage of our success and the positive publicity ? What youngster have we landed that we wouldn't have had we not had that success and positive publicity ?

Specifically, are the recruits we've signed the past 2 years - including these 2 above - better than, equal to or less talented that what we have recently had in Sankes ( transfer from Rutgers ), Serravelle, Whearty, Szatsko, Wilson, Jerz and Meade ?

AIR ( someone please correct me if I'm wrong ), when Clifford's name first surfaced I did a search on Insiders of their Top 100 'big men' rankings nationally as well as for the Top 25 in the northeast. Clifford wasn't listed. Forget the Big East....do we know if any A-10 or MAAC schools made bonafide scholarship offers to him ? I don't recall where Doherty was ranked in the northeast or what schools above the Ivy/Patriot level made confirmed scholarship offers to him.

To be blunt, who did we beat out/steal these 2 kids from in the recruiting process as indicative of making 'hay' off our success/positive press ?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> Re: To: Curious -- lou, 22:07:33 06/13/04 Sun

Is it possible that a 6'10" high school basketball player whose team won the Mass State championship, and who is an excellent student just may be interested in accepting a scholarship to play at Holy Cross for Coach Willard, and nowhere else?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]