Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2 ]

Subject: Re: Norway-to Knut Holt Author: Sue (UK) [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: Thursday, July 27, 2017, 08:31: am In reply to: Knuit Holt 's message, "The matter about mouslims are somewhat blended" on Monday, June 26, 2017, 08:09: pm You inferred elsewhere on this board that "sexual abuse" was being diagnosed because of reflex anal dilation - the relevance of which has long since been disproved Why are there no Norwegian pressure groups highlighting this "abusive" CPS practice After all the evidence is out there: 1. https://www.newgon.net/wiki/Reflex_anal_dilatation (but really the "49%" statistic is all you really need) 2. http://adc.bmj.com/content/archdischild/64/2/303.2.full.pdf (which concludes that in isolation RAD is useless as "evidence of sexual abuse") 3. http://adc.bmj.com/content/archdischild/63/7/832.full.pdf (supplement to the above, naturally page4-column1 got my attention) [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Disproving of reflexive anal dilatation as abuse indicator Author: Sue (UK) [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Thursday, May 10, 2018, 04:43: am If the Dr Marietta Higgs case isn't enough for you, refer to this https://web.archive.org/web/20171007122822/http://www.ipt-forensics.com:80/journal/volume1/j1_3_1.htm [ Post a Reply to This Message ]