Not really Kennedy??? -- JFK Project

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

Subject: Not really Kennedy???

Author:
Mark Picinich

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:14:37 02/27/02 Wed
In reply to: Mr. Torres 's message, "Was there anything wrong with the front of the President's head?" on 11:00:45 02/06/02 Wed

I found this pretty cool press report with some qoutes from doctors at parkland memorial that say the shot came from the front. Also, a naval officer said that the pictures of JFK's head is not really him or atleast cahnged to make it look like the shots came from behind

The central contention of the report is that brain photographs in the Kennedy records are not of Kennedy's brain and show much less damage than Kennedy sustained when he was shot in Dallas and brought to Parkland Hospital there on Nov. 22, 1963. The doctors at Parkland told reporters then that they thought Kennedy was shot from the front and not from behind as the Warren Commission later concluded.

"I am 90 to 95 percent certain that the photographs in the Archives are not of President Kennedy's brain," Horne, a former naval officer, said in an interview. "If they aren't, that can mean only one thing -- that there has been a cover-up of the medical evidence. . . . The second brain was consistent with a shot from behind. The first one was not."

here is the rest of the release

http://www.ishipress.com/2brains.htm

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
MEDICAL COVERUP	Fan Z	07:06:01 03/06/02 Wed