Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

Subject: Well said BN Author: BRD [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: "Wed, May 18 2011, 14:09:01 GMT" In reply to: BillesleyNomad 's message, "Colts and academies" on "Wed, May 18 2011, 9:12:10 GMT" I have to agree with most of your post Billesley Nomad. Some of the problem is that people (parents included) don't appreciate the step up in ability/quality/power that is required to move from Colts rugby to any Senior rugby, let alone the Championship. The size/power/fitness of all levels (national) has increased immeasurably over the last 5/10 years. This means it is a lot more difficult to move from U20 to Senior rugby, at a high level, than before. Therefore, the more likely route into a Championship club, for most players, is to move to maybe a Level 3/4/5 club where they can develop and, if good enough, come back to Moseley at a later stage. This applies more to forwards than backs, obviously Also agree with your comment that: players gravitate to clubs that are appropriate to their ability - they always have done. however, i would add:- players gravitate to clubs that are appreciate their ability - as they say 'beauty is in the eye of the beholder'. My only comment on Premiership academies is basically unprintable. Once again, good post BN cheers BRD b.t.w. Both my boys have played for Moseley Colts, one has played for the 1st team and, hopefully, the other one will in the future [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> Subject: Well said BN Author: red nose [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: "Mon, May 23 2011, 0:55:16 GMT" "My only comment on Premiership academies is basically unprintable." Well I don't know why... my lad is at Wuss and the training is fantastic, totally professional. Mose hasnt got the facilities or full time coaches/physios to produce premiership players. [ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> [> [> Subject: The poinyt being... Author: BillesleyNomad [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: "Mon, May 23 2011, 9:51:44 GMT" That those facilites are RFU funded. The RFU want to see young England qualified players training and playing in a professional environment. Their solution; fund academies at Prem clubs who can then lend (DR) the lads to clubs in the Championship. How much competative rugby does your lad get for Wuss? Why not put the support in place to fund the training/development of players at the level where they can play competative rugby. John Steele is always on about how there are no "hand-outs" from the RFU; everything he tells us is based on getting a return for English rugby. Just a shame that he, along with the rest of the RFU, forgets that English rugby is a lot more than team England and the Premiership and that there are lots if clubs outside of the AP who are perhaps more deserving of RFU "investment" than some within. [ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> [> [> Subject: The argument about academies.... Author: Red&Black Pear [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: "Mon, May 23 2011, 10:02:09 GMT" ....is not that they don't provide excellent facilities and professional coaches which they obvisouly do but that they draw young players away who do not get meaningful playing time because the "A" league is a farce (only taken seriosuly by clubs if they get anywhere near the final) and then have to be loaned out to other clubs to "develop" their skills. If the Academies were so good then there would be a proper academy comepetion, as there is in Rugby League, and players would not be being "loaned" out but would get all their skills and game coaching at the Academy rather than just being tunred into identikit gym monkeys. And why shoudl the academies just be at Premiership Clubs? If the RFU actyually cared about anythign other than The Cartel they would see that some clubs outside it have a fantastic record of producing and developing talent. Nothing against your lad Red Nose or Worcester per se but the whole Acadamy system was skewed right from the start and should be either revisited or scapped competely. [ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> [> [> [> Subject: rfu funding Author: jonnoisgod [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: "Mon, May 23 2011, 17:37:59 GMT" I know of two lads who are / have been with a Prem academy , one is on the verge of being released after wasting two years of his parents cash on his accomadation , expenses etc , which annoys me when you see the amount of money swilling around in the RFU and lads have to pay themselves , the other is about to go to the same club and as his parents had not got the money to send him hes had to raise it from sponsers , which to be honest , is disgracefull ! . The first lad was told , in his first year to eat as much as possible and to do mainly gym work , as such he put on 3st , as someone said , all academy lads are is gym monkeys , I wonder if you are brought over from Samoa with very little cash , do the club help you out ? [ Post a Reply to This Message ]