VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234 ]
Subject: Norton and Adams


Author:
Phil Hall
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: "Tue, May 24 2011, 13:36:22 GMT"
In reply to: John 's message, "I agree entirely!" on "Tue, May 24 2011, 12:06:47 GMT"

Agree wholeheartedly, even if Norton did continue playing England sevens, although I do not understand why Bristol want rid of the, particularly Norton. Mind you Adams still plays the drama queen with his "I've been obstructed ref". I noticed that he is obstructed at least once in every game. None-the-less he is still a good attacking centre - even if his defence is suspect.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.