>
VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18:23:08 11/29/02 Fri
Author: Alice
Author Host/IP: adsl-63-206-95-237.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net / 63.206.95.237
Subject: Don't ever be sorry for a fabulous and true rant ;-) (EOM)
In reply to: Kyla 's message, "Re: Just saw Vanilla Sky" on 13:23:29 11/29/02 Fri

>>>
>as a general rule, the more amazing and fascinating a
>person thinks they are, the less they actually are.
>
>You beat me to it, Alice...what a great statement!
>That describes my sentiments regarding most of
>Hollywood. Us common peons are supposed to care about
>there latest real estate purchase,latest
>"relationship," or how much they spent on their dress
>for Grammy's. Many of them do not strike me as being
>very intelligent, either. Then,we are supposed to laud
>them as heros for coming out of the substance
>addictions. I'm not speaking about everyone, however,
>there are some impressive people out there.
>
>That was kind of a rant, sorry about that
>
>
>
>
>as a general rule, the more amazing and fascinating a
>>>person thinks they are, the less they actually are.
>>
>>You are SO right.
>>
>>>But I am not with you on Quills - all I knew about it
>>>was that it was 'really bad'. but I loved it - the
>>>dialogue was riveting - rush is a damn good actor and
>>>so is kate - and the whole shakepearean measure for
>>>measure thing always grabs me - it is one of my
>>>favourite 'points'.
>>
>>Did I say it was really bad? I don't know why I am so
>>extreme. To tell you the truth, my whole view of it
>>was negatively skewed by the writing with shit
>>episode. I'd give it 3 out of 5 quills.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.