Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ]

Subject: I really don't think the organizers of MUC feel that it has anything to do with 'Canada' to them it has everything to do with winning the crown, no matter what it takes. Typically latin american countries have more 'wins' and have more coaches, training, etc. I agree, there are services in Canada but ultimatley its not about Canada as much as it is about the crown. MUC doesnt promise any Canadian content, the titleholders do more appearances in other countries than in Canada and after the MU they pretty much are invisible. Is it right or fair? Who is to say....everyone in Canada will still be cheering for 'Miss Canada' come MU Maybe if Canada as a country sponsored teh pageant or gave funding to the winner like a lot of the other countries they would utilize more of Canada's resources but for now, as long as MUC is MUC we will continue to see this pattern....but at least we have winners, finalists and semi-finalists, more so than we have ever had with any other organization. Author: Christi [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 20:47:35 07/21/10 Wed In reply to: Mike (Hoping they don't put her in giant PLUMES) 's message, "I understand that Denis has close ties with Latin America, and I think he was even national director (or probably still is) of Miss Nicaragua. But what I am concerned about is the lack of "Canadian content" here. I mean, the services that they're paying for in Colombia and Venezuela are also available here in Canada, especially in Toronto, where most of the winners live, anyway. I'm just sayin our winner is of Russian heritage, picked by a Nicaraguan(-Canadian) director, and trained by Venezuelan and Colombian professionals. I'm all about diversity, don't get me wrong, but where is CANADA in the picture?" on 18:53:49 07/21/10 Wed [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date I get it, and you're absolutely right. Winning is of utmost importance here. I'm merely questioning if sending our girls to Latin America for training and polishing is necessary. I dunno, maybe it's cheaper to get everything done down there? Whatever the reason is, it's not necessarily more effective. Correct me if I'm wrong, but in the last 7 years (8 this year) that MUC has held the MU franchise, they've produced 1 winner (2005) and 2 semifinalists (2003, 2006). The Canadian Search for Miss Universe (CSMU), on the other hand, for 8 years between 1995 and 2002, produced 2 finalists (1995, 2000) and 1 semifinalist (2002). All 3 girls in the latter group were prepared locally. Take MWC as an example, as well.... (More inside) Mike (BRING OUT THOSE NOISEMAKERS) 04:58:48 07/22/10 Thu Correction: MWC has 2 finalists (2003, 2009) and 2 semifinalists (2005, 2006). (NT) -- Mike D, 20:42:05 07/22/10 Thu