What was disappointing about 2008 and 2009? -- Canadian Pageant Fans' HQ

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ]

Subject: What was disappointing about 2008 and 2009?

Author:
Zinger
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 01:59:05 05/20/11 Fri
In reply to: JF 's message, "In all fairness, I think both pageants allow girls that clearly don't stand a chance nor fit into the pageant world. However, MUC website is way better that MWC. Personally, Im fed up of MUC always being from Ontario especially from GTA...I would love to see a winner outside of Ontario for once. As for MWC, time will tell, maybe there will be some major upgrades in the future. I do personally miss MWC under the management of Connie Fitzpatrick, Jimmy Steele and that crew...the first years were amazing (2003-2007), then it disappointed me in 2008 and 2009." on 17:35:37 05/19/11 Thu

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date

The quality of the winners were disappointing for me in 2008 and 2009. After years of selecting gorgeous gals, we ended up with these 2 winners in 2008 and 2009, clearly not at the same level of the previous winners. Thats only my personal opinion though (NT) JF 11:57:57 05/20/11 Fri

Not up to standard? I think you should preface this by saying that this is just your opinion - and and UNFORMED one at that.....Whilst the 2008 gil did not place -neither did 2007 or 2004 . The 2009 winner (who apparently dissapoint you) (Lena Ma) placed SECOND HIGHEST at MW in Canadian Pagenant history - So if your OPINION is that the winners were not beautiful, then that is not the fault of the organizer, it was the judges choice, and in 2008 Jimmy Steel and Connie Fitzpatrick WERE judges as, and Connie was a judge in 2009 (which is unethical in my opinion) - And as far as I know in 2003 (the first for that org) MWC under that management - only had 6 contestants (the winner eventually went on the place 1st RU at MW) (NT) -- Zinger, 13:04:34 05/20/11 Fri

I clearly stated that this was my opinion from the very beginning. Yes, it was maybe the judges fault, but still, they got accepted as candidates by the organization. Also, I didn't imply that all the girls placed, I just said that I found them to be all gorgeous from 2003-2007, and then not up to international standards (again, thats my personal opinion). (NT) -- JF, 17:51:23 05/21/11 Sat

OK - well then your statement is hogwash - with no basis whatesover. Because if we go by the MW standard - since Lena Ma (2009) placed higher than all of them except 2003. (NT) -- Zinger, 12:39:04 05/22/11 Sun

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.