VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 00:20:56 11/06/00 Mon
Author: 鄭穎珊
Subject: 對於<雨前>的一點意見

在導修課看見同學們十分熱烈地討論<雨前>,現在我也想說一下自己的意見.
首先,我看這篇作品時,是只從文字的表面上看.然而我覺得這是一篇寫得很優美很細緻的散文,作者雖雕琢文字,但卻不見造作和過於雕琢;反而更見作者藝術手法的高超.如作者寫鴨子的那一部份,更令人如見其景.即使不看作品背後的意義,<雨前>本身也是一篇如詩一般的散文來.

又我自己不大認同同學說,若<雨前>與政治沒有關係的話,那作品便沒有意義的說法.文學作品難道只是為政治服務的嗎?那麼抒情的作品都沒有它的價值了嗎? 一篇作品的成就是不是由此釐定,我想還有商榷的餘地吧.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.