VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 21:47:04 11/23/00 Thu
Author: 傅子衛
Subject: 小小意見
In reply to: 馮志弘 's message, "Re: 《小二黑結婚》和《第一爐香》" on 04:24:04 11/23/00 Thu

個人認為,在評價一部作品時把讀者也一併列入考慮範圍也無不可,
可能對我們翻譯系的同學來說,「讀者」永遠也是其中一個要考慮的
因素吧!我明白這篇作品是要作為一種「教化工具」。但,單就一篇
文學作品(?)來看,這實在是一個毫不吸引的故事!我很同意蘇同
學所說,徹頭徹尾像在看一本電器用品說明書。同樣是教化,《小二
黑》比起那些「樣板戲」,實在遜色得多,最少那些樣板戲到現在還
可以當成是一部獨立的藝術作品來看──我中學時就曾看過其中一齣
,那時根本不知道它有甚麼政治工用呢!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.