VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 03:04:06 12/01/00 Fri
Author: 智敏
Subject: 附庸實質,及其廣義上的娼女真相?

我并不完全贊同此說法。与其把婚姻看作賣淫,不若說張對婚姻悲觀吧!誠然張筆下女性多只有作“女結婚員”一途,“為結婚而結婚”,但,當中也有愛情成份。張曾說“地母”才是真正的、愛人的神,“地母”雖是妓,卻因愛而神圣,不是附庸實質的男性附屬。
正如老師所說,喬琪、梁太才是附庸實質。
還有,老師,十分感謝你那天的幫忙。

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.