VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 02:23:38 12/05/00 Tue
Author: 楊育萍
Subject: 回應法西斯細菌

我想對第三組的導修問題作些許回應:
首先是對夏衍的劇作人物風格被評為「淡彩」和「素描」這個講法
我參考過作者的三個法西斯細菌代跋,其中作者自身認為以上的批評是天真的,而且他對於法西斯細菌這一劇,他不過認為是etude,而不是作品,並且他自身認為作為一個畫家,是必需要懂得油畫,而不只是簡單的素描。如果人們評他的作品為淡彩,那只表示他的人物不夠鮮明,而不可能當作一種風格來看。
我自己看完這個劇,認為作者對人物的刻劃是極為突出的,而當中亦有一種典型性,即馮師兄你上堂時所講的那種。
而對「素描」這個詞語,我想它當中並不一定含有簡單,平淡的意思,如果你有學過畫,你就會知道,素描並不易,而且當中還有彩描呢,從素描的過程來說,當中一幅畫會有成千上萬條線,我想到的是千萬種複雜的關係,而呈現出來的一個形象,那並不簡單。

而對於第二題,我想劇中作者想要表達的並不只對知識份子有現實意義,對於生活在過去的,現世的,未來的,同樣有著一個相當程度的關聯,這是人和社會不可分割的互維關係,也是歷史和人類的問題,政治是生活的一部份,我想這是不容爭議的,但幾多人能在意識之餘而又能做到關心和明白,那又是另一個難題了。

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.