Re: K&N filter versus OEM -- S-10crewcab.com

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5 ]

Subject: Re: K&N filter versus OEM

Author:
Joe

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 07:11:45 09/05/02 Thu
In reply to: Steven 's message, "Re: K&N filter versus OEM" on 05:13:22 09/05/02 Thu

I dont know if my engine broke in at the same time or if it was the K&N, but as soon as i installed it (2100mi) I was getting 17mpg instead of 15ish. However I did install the cone type, not the flat one. I had to give K&N the measurements and they picked one that would slide over the intake. I just removed the whole top of the air box, I guess I dont need to do the hole in the air box or the headlight mod.
Joe

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]