VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Fri April 04, 2003 18:29:42
Author: 丞相
Subject: 我不同意
In reply to: 23:21 's message, "石頭問題" on Fri April 04, 2003 18:25:55

如果單以這一個接近詭辯的羅輯推論就能推翻有數千年歷史的宗教,那末免太簡單了。
你並不能說這推論能否定神的存在,你只可以把它形容為無神論的其中一個論據,它只是羅輯上否定全能的存在。
但如果把神定義為非全能的,就像中國傳說中神仙或佛陀,這推論則毫無意義。

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:



Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]

Forum timezone: GMT+7
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.