re: poor poor joe blow -- Rules Committee PRIVATE FORUM

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:21:38 09/27/00 Wed
Author: justy
Subject: re: poor poor joe blow
In reply to: tracee 's message, "re: poor poor joe blow" on 08:16:03 09/25/00 Mon

this sounds like a good idea, let's definitely discuss it at next meeting good one tracee

> ok-see what you guys think of this
> while it doesnt immediately take care of joe-maybe it
> can prevent the next one from occuring
> see what you think
>
> NEW RULE SUBCOMMITTEE PROPOSAL
> all ladder matches must be reported immediately. if
> they are not reported within 1 hour after match, user
> may immediately file a complaint via unreported match
> link.
> (taking out email option and 24 hour option)
> if the person who did not report plays another
> game(verifiable by profile--whether it is yahoo or
> cases)before that match is reported-unreported party
> may file a user complaint against individual for
> penalties to be assessed by ladder op staff.(which
> should include penalty box time and/or runging)
>
>
> i think this is as close as we can get to this
> problem-we have to make it a punishable offense to try
> and keep it from occurring--not sure we can enforce an
> immediate report issue-but if the ops will take a
> heavy hand in this--it should cure the problem--and
> eliminate it-instead of forcing an issue that has no
> repercussions.
>
> just something i thought--we don't want a bandaid on
> the problem-we want to keep it from occurring.
>
> =)
>
> tracee

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]