Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct: 
Feedback: 
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
| [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ] |
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [>
Re: Boycotting teh voy.com forum..... -- Bitch, 19:01:55 06/07/04 Mon (68.80.41.29)
AHem....................still waiting ygsm :D
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [>
fuck off -- ygsm, 00:37:30 09/10/04 Fri (168.143.113.138)
>AHem....................still waiting ygsm :D
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [>
kharn didn't take credit for those, you nitwit -- eom, 02:55:52 06/07/04 Mon (68.253.212.189)
>THIS IS STUPID, on the other hand, was an obnoxious
>asshole.
>I banned zem because when I checked the ip of the 5th
>or 10th post I came across, it had zem's name on it.
>
>I later saw Kharn or somebody taking credit for some
>of those posts, but zem was already unbanned by that
>point, so I saw no point in banning anyone else.
don't you ever read that board sober?
ps
what kharn said was that he reg'd the name 'this is stupid', thus preventing further use of that name.
although, what point he thought there was to that I have no idea.
hash is legal there, I think.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [>
Re: kharn didn't take credit for those, you nitwit -- ygsm, 07:39:15 06/07/04 Mon (151.204.157.248)
>>THIS IS STUPID, on the other hand, was an obnoxious
>>asshole.
>>I banned zem because when I checked the ip of the 5th
>>or 10th post I came across, it had zem's name on it.
>>
>>I later saw Kharn or somebody taking credit for some
>>of those posts, but zem was already unbanned by that
>>point, so I saw no point in banning anyone else.
>
>
>don't you ever read that board sober?
>
>ps
>
>what kharn said was that he reg'd the name 'this is
>stupid', thus preventing further use of that name.
>although, what point he thought there was to that I
>have no idea.
>hash is legal there, I think.
No, I don't read the board sober very much. duh.
Zem claimed he stopped posting at 1:00pm, Kharn said he reg'd the id, I drew a bad inference from it and didn't do anything anyway.
yawn.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [>
Re: kharn didn't take credit for those, you nitwit -- Kharn, 16:14:17 06/08/04 Tue (213.84.47.237)
>what kharn said was that he reg'd the name 'this is
>stupid', thus preventing further use of that name.
>although, what point he thought there was to that I
>have no idea.
The funny thing is that actually works, because registered names show the same thing as is shown to banned people, which is, uhm, "uh, uh, naughty"
So whoever is posting could also assume he's banned, rather than that some cocktard reg'd his name.
Meh, depends on the stupidity of the spammer
>hash is legal there, I think.
That might also have been of influence on the above, yes.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]