the cutest irony -- Jesus Army Watch Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 27/11/09 4:27:18pm
Author: Peter Eveleigh
Subject: the cutest irony
In reply to: John Smith 's message, "Re: insinuations - the JA way" on 27/11/09 9:39:18am

The cutest irony is the line Sarah has been fed, and has since repeated a few times here....that the reason she doesn't want to be involved with the Jesus Army Dialogue any more is that she doesn't want to be controlled by Peter Eveleigh, because she doesn't let any man control her.

You can hear them all saying it, just as they have said it in the past about anyone who agrees with me on here, that they are safest staying away from Peter Eveleigh, who will try to control them :)

On the pretext of not beign controlled by my evil influences, Sarah is willing to be controlled by her husband after he has been discreetly entreated to get his wife under control and shut her up.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: the cutest irony -- Sarah Hughes, 27/11/09 11:25:50pm
- equal moderation would have meant a shared responsibility -- Peter Eveleigh, 28/11/09 12:19:48am
  - Stockholm syndrome -- Peter Eveleigh, 28/11/09 12:37:56am
    - Re: Stockholm syndrome -- Peter Eveleigh, 28/11/09 12:46:05am
    - Re: Stockholm syndrome -- Sarah Hughes, 1/12/09 4:18:55pm

[ Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>The cutest irony is the line Sarah has been fed, and >has since repeated a few times here....that the reason >she doesn't want to be involved with the Jesus Army >Dialogue any more is that she doesn't want to be >controlled by Peter Eveleigh, because she doesn't let >any man control her. > >You can hear them all saying it, just as they have >said it in the past about anyone who agrees with me on >here, that they are safest staying away from Peter >Eveleigh, who will try to control them :) > >On the pretext of not beign controlled by my evil >influences, Sarah is willing to be controlled by her >husband after he has been discreetly entreated to get >his wife under control and shut her up.
Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.