Re: Iron Design -- 1 Iron Golf Reviews

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:11:16 11/05/22 Sat
Author: David Lake
Subject: Re: Iron Design
In reply to: Trent 's message, "Iron Design" on 07:20:45 11/04/22 Fri

Trent,

A hollow body iron is strictly marketing hype and not based upon any performance factors. If there were any truth in it then all brands and lines of irons would switch to this. Believe me - strictly marketing.

You will note in the specs of the Cobra King Forged Tec One Length irons that the lie angles varies throughout the set while club length remains the same. This results in a complete miss-match between lie angle and club length requiring you to use a different swing posture and swing plane with each iron. This is where Cobra completely ignores the concept of single-length play and tries to create a weird hybrid that appeals to those who prefer conventional irons.

As far as their muscle back design, better players definitely do not prefer this design over a cavity back. To my knowledge, there is no pro on tour who plays muscle back irons and hasn't been since the introduction of cavity back irons. Whereas cavity back irons produce an extreme level of forgiveness on off-center hits which benefits the better player as well as the high handicapper, muscle back irons produce much less consistent solid ball striking and far less accuracy.

David Lake

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> Re: Iron Design -- Trent, 11:58:39 11/05/22 Sat

Maybe I’m using the terminology incorrectly
Titleist T200, TaylorMade P790, Callaway Apex, Ping G425… are these not hollow body designs?
Titleist T100 are the most played iron on tour - are these not muscle backs?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Re: Iron Design -- David Lake, 15:31:03 11/05/22 Sat

Trent,

The T100 are cavity back. Tungsten weighting at the base on either side of the back cavity and perimeter weighting around the sides and top. The same is true of the other irons you mention. There is a shell on the back that covers the internal perimeter weighted cavity which they all incorporate. These are not "hollow body" designs, but rather, simply a covered cavity.

David Lake

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> Re: Iron Design -- Trent, 10:03:14 11/06/22 Sun

Interesting! Good to know. Thanks for the education lesson

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.