Re: reply to Justine -- universitydancesport.com forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ]

Subject: Re: reply to Justine

Author:
Ian

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:31:04 11/04/03 Tue
In reply to: Justine 's message, "Re: reply to Justine" on 14:23:59 11/04/03 Tue

No Justine you're right, it does depend on the software, but the format is new, so the software isn't designed to cope with the split. Repechage systems do exist but don't allow the repechage to develop into a whole new competition, without programming in the new comp you can't input marks. So its a bit busier for the scrutineer, running the first division first gives the scrutineer an extra few minutes before they need the second division competition to be fully set up.

IVDA in recent years has been so busy that scrutineers have sometimes asked for pre-entries so that they can input a fair amount of the data before the comp starts.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Re: reply to Justine	Ali	17:44:06 11/04/03 Tue