Re: Scary couples and SF -- universitydancesport.com forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ]

Subject: Re: Scary couples and SF

Author:
Justine

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:42:17 11/04/03 Tue
In reply to: Ian 's message, "Scary couples and SF" on 14:22:51 11/04/03 Tue

>Last years SF had straight finals in advanced, so I
>can't imagine that its overburdened with "scary
>couples"

I must admit, I think there is plenty of scope & time for additional events at the SF, basic events or an inter-uni event would be nice :). The last 2 years it has just been a smaller SUDA!

Some of the Advanced dancers at the SF would actually do Intermediate in SUDA/IVDA. I'm not sure it's worth having these splits as there aren't enough couples to make it a worthwhile event. There were still a few "scary couples" but not a final's worth.

Part of the reason behind the Nov/Int/Adv split was so A team couples from small unis didn't have to dance against the scary couples. And Scary B team couples from good unis could dance against the other scary couples. The SF eliminates *most* of the scary couples by not inviting Impoxbridge so the reasoning behind the splits mostly disappears.

Perhaps the SF should rethink its structure? There is no constitution so the hosts can do pretty much what they want :)

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Scary couples - Reply to Paul	Ian	15:04:36 11/04/03 Tue

Re: Scary couples - Reply to Paul	Robin	17:22:05 11/04/03 Tue

Re: Scary couples - Reply to Paul	Karen	22:02:48 11/04/03 Tue