Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ]

Subject: Re: Amalgamated teams - interpreting the constitution Author: Ali [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 13:56:23 11/12/03 Wed In reply to: Paul J 's message, "Re: Amalgamated teams - interpreting the constitution" on 12:50:54 11/12/03 Wed >My reading is that an amalgamated team is a team that >represents two Member Societies. No, at no stage is a 2-uni limit imposed, and the IVDA const makes it clear that members of amalgamated teams do not represent their parent uni. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date Re: Amalgamated teams - interpreting the constitution Paul J 14:52:38 11/12/03 Wed Re: Amalgamated teams - interpreting the constitution -- Ali, 15:09:04 11/12/03 Wed Re: Amalgamated teams - interpreting the constitution -- Tim C, 16:24:13 11/12/03 Wed