VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ]
Subject: Re: Amalgamated teams - interpreting the constitution


Author:
Paul J
 		[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 12:50:54 11/12/03 Wed
In reply to: TimC 's message, "Re: Amalgamated teams - interpreting the constitution" on 12:23:39 11/12/03 Wed
 >Incidentally, I agree that it is not IVDA's place to
>decide how smaller competitions run themselves, but
>what happens here does affect IVDA eligibility. If we
>decide that this will render those Cambridge dancers
>ineligible, then they are still welcome to compete as
>an amalgamated team at Warwick, but they should
>understand the consequences.

My reading is that an amalgamated team is a team that represents two Member Societies. Dancing for it therefore shouldn't rule out Cambridge couples under 2.1.4.6. However, this interpretation probably requires:
* Cambridge to approve the amalgamation
* Cambridge couples to be part of no more than one amalgamated team. (Ie there can't be both a Nottingham/Cambridge team and a UEA/Cambridge team.)

I agree that if, for example, Cambridge couples dance on the Leeds team (as opposed to a Leeds/Cambridge amalgamated team), then they won't be able to dance for Cambridge at IVDA.
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Re: Amalgamated teams - interpreting the constitutionIan12:58:37 11/12/03 Wed
Re: Amalgamated teams - interpreting the constitutionAli13:56:23 11/12/03 Wed

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.