Agree with your analysis of the Watkins goal. ESR was on him, while both Andersen and Berge rushed to try to do something. But it raises the question once again about how we defend corners. An attacking midfielder on their biggest goal threat? Makes no sense to me. I understand things are zonal now, but if we are marking someone, which we were, why use someone less suited to the job!? -- SW6.doc

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Wednesday, October 23, 11:36:57pm [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Sunday, October 20, 12:46:58pm
Author: eganonoa
Author Host/IP: NoHost / 163.5.171.48
Subject: Agree with your analysis of the Watkins goal. ESR was on him, while both Andersen and Berge rushed to try to do something. But it raises the question once again about how we defend corners. An attacking midfielder on their biggest goal threat? Makes no sense to me. I understand things are zonal now, but if we are marking someone, which we were, why use someone less suited to the job!?
In reply to: MWKent 's message, "I also disagree with the post. The ball to Watkins was similar to Raul 's for his goal and pace won the day and the ref did the rest. Regarding Watkins header, ESR was supposed to mark him but gave up, as Watkins was too cleaver for him." on Sunday, October 20, 12:30:24pm

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

!? We have been excedefendi g corners this season. One blip doesn't make everything wrong. Definitely ann error that we will learn from. (NT) -- Honest, Sunday, October 20, 01:25:53pm (host81-157-66-39.range81-157.btcentralplus.com/81.157.66.39)
- Leicester's goal. Similar questions were asked. So far this season only three teams have conceded more "shot creating actions" from dead balls than us. Even the commentator in the stream in the US made a point of saying at the start of the match that we struggle to defend corners and Villa are good at them and predicting that as potential difference. It's pretty apparent that we are struggling in this aspect of our game. (NT) -- eganonoa, Sunday, October 20, 02:35:13pm (NoHost/163.5.171.48)
- Should add, Kovacic Man City. 3 of 11 goals conceded, 27% from corners. League average over the last five seasons has been 13%, up from 11% the 5 seasons before that. It's a problem and we most definitely have not been "excellent defending corners this season." (NT) -- eganonoa, Sunday, October 20, 02:46:42pm (NoHost/163.5.171.48)
- No one seemed to pick up on the fact that ESR was assigned to Milenkovic at Forest, which I thought was really bizaare - and it led to that Wood goal that was disallowed for a fractional offside. Seems strange to me that ESR is being assigned to some of our opponents biggest threats from set pieces (NT) -- Same Old Story, Monday, October 21, 03:25:36pm (NoHost/90.241.124.131)

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.