Re: Sorry, but weren't we a few seconds from having 7 points from 4 games on Saturday? Talk about knee jerkers. Wow -- SW6.doc

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Thursday, September 19, 05:02:25pm [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Wednesday, September 18, 10:28:08am
Author: The Doc
Author Host/IP: NoHost / 90.213.210.213
Subject: Re: Sorry, but weren't we a few seconds from having 7 points from 4 games on Saturday? Talk about knee jerkers. Wow
In reply to: Jim© The Devon IP 's message, "Sorry, but weren't we a few seconds from having 7 points from 4 games on Saturday? Talk about knee jerkers. Wow" on Wednesday, September 18, 10:01:18am

Yes but that is the point. Because we have such poor forward play and finishing those points were dropped because we should have been well ahead in bothe the Man U and WHU games well before the last few minutes. The attacking skills of this current squad is extremely poor

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Because we dropped points on Saturday because our defence switched off (and traore shouldn't have crossed the ball in with 60 secs left) (NT) -- Jim © (The Devon IP), Wednesday, September 18, 10:34:19am (82-132-232-238.dab.02.net/82.132.232.238)
- Mate, i'm about halfway between both ends of the spectrum here, but you know full well what people are getting at. Yes, their goal came as described, but the point being made, is that shouldn't have been relevant, because we had been so dominant, the lead should have been more than a precarious 1 goal. We're not converting our dominance, and it's costing us. I don't think thats a controversial observation (NT) -- Same Old Story, Wednesday, September 18, 10:38:41am (NoHost/90.241.124.131)
  - No, it's not that I don't agree with us not taking chances, but the OTT reactions; season is over, we don't have a 10 goal striker (Muiz scored 10 last), Stansfield was the answer, it's going to be a struggle etc etc. It's just overly negative after what I've watched. Last nights result was a kick in the bollocks definitely, but it was a complete second team albeit one that should have won. (NT) -- Jim© The Devon IP, Wednesday, September 18, 10:51:55am (62-64-192-58.virtual1.co.uk/62.64.192.58)

[ Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
Note: This forum is moderated -- new posts are not visible until approved.
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

E-mail address (optional):

Type your message here:

Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Note: This forum is moderated -- new posts are not visible until approved.

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.