Oh...ED...falling for "marketing"??? McGhee's blocks were all about being in better position than Damian, not about explosiveness. McGhee was almost never out of position in that game. But the bigger question is this...had Damian dunked on McGhee one time, would that have made you forget the 3 or 4 blocks? My point is, let's take substance over flash...he had one of his best statistical nights against one of the best teams in the country, and it still wasn't enough?? -- Duquesne Dukes Basketball Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

a, October 17 2024 [ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Friday, December 03, 02:48:01pm
Author: Slim
Subject: Oh...ED...falling for "marketing"??? McGhee's blocks were all about being in better position than Damian, not about explosiveness. McGhee was almost never out of position in that game. But the bigger question is this...had Damian dunked on McGhee one time, would that have made you forget the 3 or 4 blocks? My point is, let's take substance over flash...he had one of his best statistical nights against one of the best teams in the country, and it still wasn't enough??
In reply to: El Duque 's message, "But after watching Damian for the past three years, don't you think he looked a little "flat-footed?" He used to leap over taller players like they were nothing. Great shot of him dunking over the freakishly tall dude from Temple. McGhee is a big man and moves well, but if Damian is healthy I think he should be able to get underneath him or go over the top. Most of McGhee's blocks were against Saunders." on Friday, December 03, 01:03:00pm

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Since we lost, no, it wasn't enough. Just sayin'. (NT) -- El Duque, Friday, December 03, 07:37:51pm
- But my point is that he didn't have his usual explosiveness. (NT) -- El Duque, Friday, December 03, 07:39:54pm
  - McGhee is strong player with a chance to be in the running for Big East Defensive player of the year. As slim said he is STRONG and positions himself well unlike the player from temple. I saw it different....I thought Saunders came to play and did not think of him as a liability....I thought Pitt just outmuscled him (NT) -- Greg, Saturday, December 04, 01:26:16pm

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.