VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

a, February 05 2025 [ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Monday, October 04, 08:49:39pm
Author: duq81
Subject: All of that is true. Pitt and Duquesne got into trouble for many of the same reasons. Their campuses were small, crappy, and outdated. They needed to spend lots of money to bring the physical plants up to par. Litchfield also spent money trying to raise the academic profile of Pitt. (more inside)
In reply to: Bilgy 's message, "Students Saved Duquesne" on Monday, October 04, 06:08:13pm

Pitt was in big trouble by the mid 60's, and was forced to give up it's status as a private school. Duquesne, as a Catholic school, didn't have any such option.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

  • Another point in a long list of reasons to hate Pitt! (NT) -- Jules, Tuesday, October 05, 01:38:09pm
    Forum timezone: GMT-5
    VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.