VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345678910 ]
Subject: Justin Watson


Author:
Bryan
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 18:29:29 02/22/24 Thu
In reply to: Son of Eli 's message, "Yale joins Dartmouth in restoring admissions Testing Requirement" on 09:23:33 02/22/24 Thu

Clearly the decisions by Dartmouth and Yale were not based primarily on athletics. But, if other Ivy schools do not follow this lead is it a small, medium or large recruiting detriment compared to other testing optional Ivy schools? (Or is it not a recruiting factor at all?) My first reaction is that it's a minor recruiting disadvantage as there is likely one recruit somewhere who has been admitted to an Ivy school in the last few years who wouldn't have been admitted if the SAT or other submission requirement had been in place.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> [> Subject: Re: Justin Watson


Author:
sparman
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 18:58:21 02/22/24 Thu

The schools claim that not using SATs works to detriment of minority applicants. So to the extent such potential applicants might be athletic recruiting targets, one might argue that requiring SATs will even create some modest recruiting advantage.

While I don't question the reason for raising the matter, IMO this is still a purely academic exercise not worth getting worked up over at the moment.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]


Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
* Message subject (required):

Name (required):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:


Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.