Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: Re: Malachi Hosely Author: John Harvard (Harvard Recruit SAT's) [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 09:18:38 12/05/24 Thu In reply to: IvySportsJunkie 's message, "Re: Malachi Hosely" on 08:13:08 12/05/24 Thu Today's Harvard Crimson reports that SAT scores of recruited athletes increased by more than 100 points from the previous year. "Recruited athletes in the Class of 2028 scored an average of 1479, while athletes in the Class of 2027 had an average score of 1368." "Non-recruited students reported an average of 1525, compared with the average of recruited athletes sitting at 1479." Because Harvard elimated its standard testing requirment starting with the Class of 2024, that was consistent between these years. Harvard has reinstated the standardized test requirment for the Class of 2029. The closing gap between recruited athletes and other students might have been impacted if more athletes chose not to take the tests. Presumably, the typical non-recruited athlete relies on his/her stellar scores to get accepted. For those of us looking at these scores and wondering how we'd be competitive today, note that the numerical test results were adjusted upwards decades ago. Reportedly, this was so that strong test scores could achieve 800's or close thereto, clustering/adding more students at the top numerically, not just percentile wise. About 10 years ago, my son and I did some research and calculations and concluded that his scores in the 1500's was comparable to mine in the 1400's. There are more perjorative hypotheses of why this skewing upwards was done, but I'll leave that for the cesspools of social media to discuss, not here in our escapist haven. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> Subject: Re: Malachi Hosely Author: Lurker [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: 11:33:02 12/05/24 Thu Not to put too fine a point on it but would emphasize that “statistically indistinguishable” would be within one std deviation, not necessarily equivalent to [ Post a Reply to This Message ]