VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Friday, April19, 09:05:pm
Author: observer
Subject: Real commentary on fake regrets

Current Councilwoman Ramona Monteverde' thoughts on the posh Mohonk resort getaway and former Councilwoman Christine Bello's commentary:


Newburgh councilwoman wishes she had voted against Mohonk venue for conference

April 18, 2024


NEWBURGH – On the eve of the $37,000 Mohonk Mountain House weekend visioning conference approved unanimously by the all-Democratic Newburgh City Council, at least one member says she has rethought the expensive location.

Ramona Monteverde is having second thoughts about the $900-per-night single-occupancy rooms and additional charges for meals.

“If it were brought up again, I definitely would have stepped up and insist that we look at another location that wasn’t as expensive,” she said.

Monteverde said while the visioning conference is vital, the weekend could have been held at a hotel in Orange County where officials could have slept at home and driven to the conference each day.


Former Councilwoman Bello's response on Facebook:

"Easy to say they would have done things differently after the damage is done. The fact is there was hardly any public input on this resolution because the decisions were made behind closed doors, which is contrary to Open Meetings Law. There was no request for bids to even try to get a better price for the taxpayers, and on top of that, the down payment to Mohonk Resort was due and payable before it was even brought to the floor. You can be certain that this was a done deal whether the taxpayers objected or not! This is the end result of one-party rule; group think."

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
 * HTML allowed in marked fields.
* Message subject (required):

* Name (required):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:

Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.