Subject: Re: Why there will never be a brown M&M spokescandy |
Author:
Big Jeff
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 09:19:45 07/20/11 Wed
In reply to:
candyvulva
's message, "Why there will never be a brown M&M spokescandy" on 23:43:25 01/09/04 Fri
>Think about it...
>
>Well first of all each existing spokescandy is not
>only a different color but a different kind of M&M.
>
>Red = Milk Chocolate
>Yellow = Peanut
>Crispy = Crispy
>Green = Mint Milkchocolate
>Blue = Dark Chocolate Peanut
>Orange(Female) = Peanutbutter
Almond = Almond
>So technically they'd have to make a new kind of M&M
>to include a brown spokescandy. Which they will,
>except not for the brown, but for the new, purple M&M.
>Why you ask? Well, this brings me to my main point.
>
>A brown spokescandy, no matter how hard they try to
>cover it up, will always look black. This would create
>all sorts of problems. First and foremost, the general
>public would be outraged and the NAACP would be on
>their asses like "ugly on an Osbourne." (greatest
>quote.. ever) Second, they would then have to amend
>the rest of the spokescadies to have each of them be
>of a different ethnicity. I say they should go by the
>olympic colors, each representing a different
>continent. We'd already have Africa, so blue,
>representing Europe, would allow the blue M&M to
>remain white. Yellow, representing Asia, would make
>the yellow M&M asian. Red, The Americas, would make
>red either indian or latino. Green, Australia... I
>think that one should just stay the way it is... as
>the single female. That only leaves orange and purple.
>Orange can be some sort of semite, like a jew, muslim,
>or hindu (are hindus semites?) And purple can be gay.
>There, that covers all the minorities. But of course,
>this can never happen, not in America. Now do you see
>why there will never be a brown M&M spokescandy? With
>something to think about, I'm Stoned Phillips.
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |