VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Sun, April 26 2009, 19:28:45 GMT-10
Author: Troy
Subject: Re: Referee pairings
In reply to: Greg Pfeiffer 's message, "Re: Referee pairings" on Sun, April 26 2009, 19:08:49 GMT-10

I think Ricky Stuart has a valid point, but none the less I dont think he can be pleased either way unless of course his team comes out of top!!



>Interesting comment by Ricky Stuart in today's paper,
>noting the differences in experience. I gather he was
>referring to the Klein/Suttor pairing with 12 NRL
>games experience then a game gets Archer/Hayne with
>300 NRL games experience. It seems odd to pair those
>two together..perhaps a trial run for SOO?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+10
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.