Date Posted:Sun, April 26 2009, 21:49:59 GMT-10 Author: Nathan Subject: Re: Stacey Jones "Knock-on" In reply to:
David
's message, "Re: Stacey Jones "Knock-on"" on Sun, April 26 2009, 21:48:29 GMT-10
>>I am referring to the knock-on ruling aginast Stacey
>>Jones last night that occurred right at the end.
>>
>>I would be curious if anyone finds out the explanation
>>for this ruling.
>>
>>Was the ruling that it touched Jones' hand then went
>>back onto the foot (which is not a knock-on), or that
>>it hit the foot and then when it went forwards touched
>>the hand (which is a knock-on).
>>
>>Viweing it on tv, it appeared that the touch was
>>before it hit the foot, and there was no clear
>>evidence that it hit the hand after it hit the foot,
>>so I thought it was play on.
>
>I was at the game last night, from what I saw the ball
>hit his leg and touched his hands. Although I was a
>fair distance away, so my observation could be
>completely wrong.
>
>It was an interesting call none the less.
are you saying that if you saw that in a game you would have given the field goal. it hit his foot then hands and was prepelled towards the opponent's goal line therefore giving a knock-on correct decision was made.
