VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Fri, September 07 2007, 20:52:22 GMT-10
Author: Gregory Pfeiffer
Subject: Re: Cutting the scrum
In reply to: nac 's message, "Re: Cutting the scrum" on Fri, September 07 2007, 13:46:17 GMT-10

I have yet to read a compelling reason to change the current practice. Lets just say that the evidence of referees missing knock-ons etc when short-cutting the scrum provides a compelling reason against it.

And some of us "dinosaurs" as you so rudely refer to us as have seen the consequences of short-cutting the scrum: something blatant missed and a referee made to look pretty silly.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

  • Re: Cutting the scrum -- Alex Mangovsky, Fri, September 07 2007, 21:17:46 GMT-10
    [ Contact Forum Admin ]

    Forum timezone: GMT+10
    VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.