VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 19:10:15 12/06/04 Mon
Author: steven r.
Subject: Re: W John Hewlett..SC..92 Mustang .469 8.32 @ 184
In reply to: DAVE COX 's message, "Re: W John Hewlett..SC..92 Mustang .469 8.32 @ 184" on 18:23:08 12/06/04 Mon

what? the weight difference between danny's mustang and the bbt mustang was between 250-300 lbs. If you were to add 250-300 pounds to danny's mustang do you think he is still going to '60 the same even though he has a great chassis set-up, I think not. Another factor is the turbo hit is gradual(fast but gradual) especially with one turbo, where the nos is instant. It's just the way of the beast, beleive it or not!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.