VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

13/06/26 3:56pm [ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11/06/21 11:13pm
Author: D9
Subject: So
In reply to: Maxwell 's message, "No," on 11/06/21 8:19pm

You answered the vote only, and didn't read the discussion thread that accompanied the vote, where I talked about straddling the draft with trade periods either side.

I put the question up, and the discussion and votes decide what we go with, how we go with it, and what wording is put on the rules sheet. One coach said, I would vote yes, but 48 hours is too quick, and barely worth it. The vote was heading to Yes before it was interrupted by a Autocratic ruling, but the discussions were indicative of what coaches thought. A week each side for one coach was a very good idea. If coaches agreed with that, in the discussion, one could be forgiven for thinks the rule carried for a specific 48 hour question and a one off, but the discussion took us elsewhere.

If we had more coaches doing task, say Tom was in charge of wording on the rules page, he could have run off after it was concluded and put that up for all to see in the furture.

It is structure, and routine Max. It is what happens when or after x, Y and Z happens. There is no system. We are just presuming such a discussion is dealt with to make it a regulation, a rule, a system in place from now.

If no one is activated by this, it is forgotten and it sits dormant until next time we deal with it....AGAIN. No wonder Mods don't want Votes to decide anything, because it appears you are too busy to carry it through to where it needs to go, and in what format.

That is why I bought up a broader sharing of tasks. But no one mentioned anything about that, until yesterday, when Ian put his hand up for one role. That goes ignored to this stage as well.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Forum timezone: GMT+11
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.