Name (required):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>It's interesting that competent studies of girdles' >level of commpression (tightness, firmness, etc) have >actually been done but I think the women who regularly >bought and wore foundation garments were well able to >judge such things. There are plenty of on-line >references (the Cosetiere's site, for example) to >women finding panty girdles described as firm control >being less firm than the open girdles they previously >wore. >My partner, who was quite slim, had worn M&S firm >control girdles for several years when shorter skirts >persuaded her to try tights and a panty girdle. >Naturally she bought M&S panty girdles described as >firm control. Straight away she commented that they >weren't very firm at all. In fact, she continued as >long as possible to wear her open girdles and >stockings because she felt the panty ones didn't do >enough to shape her tummy and bottom. She said the >PGs were "easier" and more comfortable to wear but >"not much good". Her complaint was that the new M&S >PGs were all-elastic, with just a double layer of >elastic at the front whereas her OBGs had a >non-stretch front panel and a strong, satin >downstretch back panel. I could certainly feel the >difference if I ran my hand over her tummy and even >more so over her rear. >After a couple of years and now wanting to give up >stockings and suspenders altogether in favour of >tights, my partner found, in a different shop, a panty >girdle whose design was similar to her old M&S OBGs, >with a good, firm front panel and a wide, satin >downstretch rear panel. She was so pleased with her >purchase that she bought two more the following week. >Her tummy was flat and felt hard and her rear was also >flatter and more "solid". Problem solved.

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.