Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2 ]

Subject: Above is the actual language of what Robin signed to become the owner. That clearly says something very different than intending to resolve “some obligations” that would maintain the reputation of Miss America. What Robin is now claiming is absurd! Author: No name [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 16:03:06 09/13/24 Fri Author Host/IP: NoHost/207.213.181.10 In reply to: 's message, "Isn't this what has always been said? Did you think this was new information?" on 15:25:29 09/13/24 Fri [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date Actually thelanguage is consistent with what she put in the pleading since she gets to determine the legitimacy, legality etc of any charted debts thereby rendering all charted debts to some obligations. English. (NT) No name (pool-96-242-88-28.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net/96.242.88.28) 09:33:02 09/14/24 Sat The language is absolutely not consistent. She could have easily said in her lawsuit that she was paying debts that were legitimate and legal. That would make sense. However, she said she is paying the ones that impact the reputation and relationships of Miss America. That is HIGLY unethical. Please don’t gaslight me. (NT) -- No name, 17:44:50 09/14/24 Sat (NoHost/207.213.181.10)