Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

Subject: So you have no comment on the fact that there was a potential eligibility change. It’s clear on their website that all the requirements listen to compete is only an age requirement Author: No name [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 21:23:03 10/15/24 Tue Author Host/IP: syn-047-231-178-134.res.spectrum.com/47.231.178.134 In reply to: 's message, "There is no evidence that Robin's MA is in debt. Where are you getting that information? All the scholarships she announced have been paid, all vendors from the pageant have been paid or we would be hearing about that. So if you are going to make a claim like that cite your facts please. I am sure everyone would like to know but only if it is factually true." on 20:38:54 10/15/24 Tue As far as debt is concerned, it’s talked about throughout this forum, in the court cases that I watched online, and if it did resolve- I would love to be informed on how. But let’s get back to the original question: is there an actual eligibility change that was not *purposefully announced? Please refer to the online eligibility requirements before answering. Thank you. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date The actual contract goes into much more detail, please move on. (NT) No name (NoHost/128.163.239.233) 08:04:32 10/16/24 Wed Would you be so kind to share those details so those who don’t know the updated eligibility rules can be informed? Thanks for your kindness and understanding (NT) -- No name, 13:52:42 10/16/24 Wed (syn-047-231-178-134.res.spectrum.com/47.231.178.134) Contract (Click In) -- No name, 14:58:03 10/16/24 Wed (NoHost/128.163.239.233) From the looks of this the “never been pregnant” part has been taken out. So it looks like you could have had a baby but not be the legal guardian of the child? (NT) -- No name, 15:06:33 10/16/24 Wed (NoHost/172.56.65.35) OMG you are really reaching. (NT) -- No name, 15:21:58 10/16/24 Wed (NoHost/128.163.239.233) That sounds about right. Also divorced women can compete (NT) -- No name, 16:17:13 10/16/24 Wed (syn-047-231-178-134.res.spectrum.com/47.231.178.134) This also includes young women who have terminated an unplanned pregnancy. (NT) -- No name, 13:09:23 10/17/24 Thu (NoHost/172.59.227.172) Very happy to see the contract allowing medically-legal females compete again. Pretty sure they went back to natural-born females only for a while? If your doctor recognizes you medically as a female, you should be able to compete! (NT) -- No name, 16:44:47 10/16/24 Wed (NoHost/172.56.201.223)