Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

Subject: Y’ALL best go read page 11 section 21. of the court ruling. It is clear as day what the judge is saying. Author: No name [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 16:39:10 10/24/24 Thu Author Host/IP: syn-024-231-184-073.res.spectrum.com/24.231.184.73 In reply to: 's message, "So are you just bad a reading comprehension or is English not your first language. You have read a whole lot into an order that says very little. Straub got nothing that he wanted except for access to some records, basically a continuation of the interim order the judge entered when he declared Robin to be status quo." on 12:30:49 10/24/24 Thu [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date I read it. Just a recitation of Galle's testimony. Same guy who claimed his laptop was stolen while on vacation which is hilarious. Conveniently loses his "only" laptop with his entire practice on it in the jungle and therefore cannot produce the meta data that would show when the so called ownership proof offered by Straub was created. So do you think this guy is honest? And isn't that EIN the same EIN that the comptroller testified was fraudulently obtained and the same guy whited out Straub's name on the doc before it was given to Robin to hide the fact this false document was filed? (NT) No name (static-198-54-132-120.cust.tzulo.com/198.54.132.120) 17:22:32 10/24/24 Thu If he is the actual owner and there was no funny business about that EIN filing then why white out his name on the document? Just hand it over as is. Makes you have to actually think about things right? LOL. I for one am buying some wine cuz this trial is going to be very entertaining. I assume, but have not yet read, that Robin's team filed some defenses claiming she owns it. Put the issue squarely before the court. Don't you wonder why Glenn did not want ownership decided on the merits? That he used this tactic to hoodwink the court? Did he think Robin would just fold? LOL (NT) -- No name, 17:24:42 10/24/24 Thu (static-198-54-132-120.cust.tzulo.com/198.54.132.120)