Re: Getting Back to nature ??? -- The Immigration Page vii

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

Subject: Re: Getting Back to nature ???

Author:
MRM

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 23:16:20 10/02/18 Tue
In reply to: MRM 's message, "Tough questions they CANNOT answer" on 01:05:27 10/02/18 Tue

They always tell us that massive immigration is necessary in order to boost our economy.

BUT, Far-Left Activists suddenly do a complete 180-degree change when speaking of tribal societies.
Claiming that simple lifestyles are better than industrialized civilizations.

It's better to "live off of the land" than to develop overbuilt societies.

In a sense; I fully agree with this statement.
Wouldn't life be better if we all got back to nature?
BUT, it contradicts the very reason why Far Leftists push for massive immigration.

(2)
On a similar note:

"Globalists" often speak of the need to preserve indigenous populations.
So, while trying to destroy entire nations; they also believe it's important to save a remote tribe.

(3)

People insist that massive immigration helps our economy.
But, these rules never apply to 3rd World nations which really WOULD improve if their demographics changed.
For example:
If you brought millions of non-Africans into Nigeria; it would certainly transform their economy for the better.
But, would it be worth changing their ethnic composition?
Would Nigerians be happy if their country became majority non-African?
of course not.

Even if it grew their economy Ten Fold, they would still prefer self-determination.

(4)
Two-Faced Liberals constantly tell us to celebrate old customs & indigenous cultures.
But, they take exception when dictating that immigration "helps us" become more modernized.
It's all garbage anyhow. Endless Contradictions.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> Subject: Brief summary: [Getting Back to Nature]

Author:
mrm
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 21:34:19 10/09/18 Tue

If you're too busy to read the previous comment in its entirety-
here's a brief summary:

Whenever pro-migration forces push for massive immigration;
they claim that it helps the economy grow.

Yet, those same people profess their loyalty to indigenous tribes around-the-world.
.....Even remote places they've never even heard of.
Their reasoning is that tribal societies are "in tune with nature".

And apparently, this is more important than needing 'economic growth'.

Every time we talk about ancient cultures: it's always revered by the Progressive Left.

While people also say that modern civilization is bad.
GREAT!

Then, you can't tell us that we need to build stronger economy.

Especially when we're already living in fully developed societies.
....and, it's not really yours to decide either.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]