Economic Instability / Lack of Steady Work -- The Immigration Page vii

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

Subject: Economic Instability / Lack of Steady Work

Author:
T.E. Shannon

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 01:01:29 10/05/18 Fri
In reply to: MRM 's message, "The Negative Effects of immigration" on 00:22:32 10/01/18 Mon

With a constant influx of migrants;
this creates too much instability in the work-force.

Whenever there's adequate work to keep our economy strong;
employers will hire temporary foreign workers in order to finish-the-job more quickly.

Then, the industry dries up altogether.

Of course, Wealthy employers claim that it helps to complete the project sooner.
But every time we're having an economic boom, we import migrants until the growth abruptly ends.

Part (B)
When first proposing this idea back in 1992; I was met with allegations of 'racism'.
Plus, pro-migration forces often taunt us claiming that we're just jealous of highly-productive & skilled non-White workers.

Ironically, the incident which inspired me to write this article pertains to White French Canadian guest-workers.

There was a huge building complex which provided nearly 2 years of steady work.
But instead, temporary workers from Quebec helped to finish the entire job within 10 months.
Then, a huge recession ensued in 1990.

Then President, George Bush Sr. got blamed for economic decline.
But mass immigration was responsible.

Part (C)
Essentially, mass immigration causes a less stable economy.
This rule includes temporary-workers as the previous article explained.
...

Ultimately, this is a system which only the wealthy benefit from.

________________________________________________________________________________________________

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> Subject: Workers are now replaceable.

Author:
MRM
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 01:21:44 10/08/18 Mon

similar to the above paragraph;

Massive immigration saturates the entire industry with perspective workers.
Essentially: We're all fighting for the same jobs.
The resulting side-effect is a total imbalance between executives and workers.

Corporate leaders now hold all the power.
While [common workers] become expendable.

In short:
Whenever there's an endless supply of workers; there's no leverage anymore.
Employers can 'hire & fire' without any consequence.
They can pick. They can Choose.
The establishment uses others solely to their advantage.

...Meanwhile;
for the lower classes: there's nothing remaining on the bargaining table.
They are reduced into servitude.

Part (B)
It's a revolving door policy.
They can always replace you with someone else.
1st Generation immigrants get mistreated, mainly because they have less options.
BUT, it over-spills to the rest of us.
Thus lowering our quality of life.
------
On a personal note:
Within my lifetime, I've seen employers hiring, then abruptly releasing workers on a daily basis.
Recently, on a small job;
the Carpenter Foreman boasted that he's fired 25 employees within less than 2 months.
(this guy has dismissed workers for merely looking at him the wrong way).

Essentially; Mass Migration has devalued the common worker.
(although it's agreed that strict Employers are equally at fault).

Part (C)
Workers have been reduced into a powerless role.
Yet, it goes far beyond issues such as Job Security.

Even if migrants remain employed;
Companies are forcing their workers to be more subordinate.
Compared to previous generations, current shifts have taken a hard-line stance against employees.
Instead of advancing the human race; we're taking a step backward.

Part (D)
You'd think that Far Leftists would fully agree with our position.
After all; Workers Rights is a very important topic.
OR, could it be; the whole purpose is to anger the lower classes and spark a revolution?
Perhaps, this is a goal which has been overlooked.

In order to invoke a Communist Workers Revolution, it's necessary to suppress the masses.
You can't have riots without a manufactured crisis.
_______________________________________________________________________________________

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]