Subject: When she signed her MAO contract for Miss Ohio, she had to give up the MOV title from last year so she doesn't qualify for Sweetheart as a Miss Ohio local titleholder and runner-up.
[> [> Subject: I think it was Rachel Ralston but because any girl that competed in MOV and then MOA (even a preliminary) no longer had their MOV title just like CT but Jacinda is a good choice no matter her placement. Plus she already has her new 2023 MOV title.
[> [> [> Subject: You don't know the placements of other girls. You don't know if there's a 'one MAO local' rule. You don't know if Sweetheart even cares.
[> [> [> [> Subject: NP: I don’t know what MOV contract says but the MO contract (that you sign before your first local) says at the time of signing the agreement, participants can’t be titleholders in any other local, state or national competition of a similar nature so if they are signing in good faith they have to resign any other title with any other system first. If that were not true CT would be going since AMM already went to Sweetheart.
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: The MAO rules don't matter bc it's Volunteer that's a feeder for Sweetheart. Maybe Caroline had other obligations Labor Day Weekend.
[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: They matter when you break your Volunteer contract to go to MAO. You break one to do the other: that’s the whole point of this conversation. CT isn’t as clean as you want her to be.
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: You comically keep assuming you know all the rules and now you're projecting your thoughts about cleanliness. Bottom line, you're still not going to Sweetheart.