Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ]

Subject: I think it was Rachel Ralston but because any girl that competed in MOV and then MOA (even a preliminary) no longer had their MOV title just like CT but Jacinda is a good choice no matter her placement. Plus she already has her new 2023 MOV title. Author: No name [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 15:12:18 08/01/23 Tue In reply to: 's message, "Guess that confirms who 3RU was... Congratulations Jacinda!" on 14:50:47 08/01/23 Tue [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> Subject: You don't know the placements of other girls. You don't know if there's a 'one MAO local' rule. You don't know if Sweetheart even cares. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: 19:38:18 08/01/23 Tue [ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> [> [> Subject: NP: I don’t know what MOV contract says but the MO contract (that you sign before your first local) says at the time of signing the agreement, participants can’t be titleholders in any other local, state or national competition of a similar nature so if they are signing in good faith they have to resign any other title with any other system first. If that were not true CT would be going since AMM already went to Sweetheart. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: 22:37:52 08/01/23 Tue [ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> [> [> [> Subject: The MAO rules don't matter bc it's Volunteer that's a feeder for Sweetheart. Maybe Caroline had other obligations Labor Day Weekend. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: 11:15:42 08/03/23 Thu [ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: They matter when you break your Volunteer contract to go to MAO. You break one to do the other: that’s the whole point of this conversation. CT isn’t as clean as you want her to be. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: 07:51:34 08/04/23 Fri [ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: You comically keep assuming you know all the rules and now you're projecting your thoughts about cleanliness. Bottom line, you're still not going to Sweetheart. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: 18:23:56 08/04/23 Fri [ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Idk who you think you’re talking to. Unless Sweetheart has a senior division, I will not be going haha Author: Cleanliness? [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: 20:11:34 08/04/23 Fri [ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Then why are you so hung up on 'the rules' on who does and does not qualify for Sweetheart? Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: 20:03:47 08/06/23 Sun [ Post a Reply to This Message ]