[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Who is showing their ass? YOU- you petty, dagger throwing bitch -- "Please reread and if you don’t get it, think," is condescending and rude AF, even with the disingenuous, please. Such arrogance to believe you can talk like that to people and not get it right back.
Author:
Then you hypocritically get on your high horse over “Word salad”. Reread & if you don’t get it, THINK.
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: I’m sorry, it is hard not to be condescending and rude to someone who is intellectually deficient, undiscerning and intellectually inept. For example, resorting to personal attacks indicates a depletion of substantive arguments. Accusing a post of being "word salad" or labeling it a "straw man argument" suggests a constrained capacity to effectively engage in the discussion. "Using profanity is a linguistic detour that veers away from the road of constructive communication."
Author:
Don’t just have a good day, have a great day :)
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Glad to see you agree with me that you are condescending and rude and admit you can't control yourself emotionally over simply being questioned on the legitimacy of your post.
You asked that if your posts are questioned, to be specific, and the NP was specific:
“Who is showing their ass” You- with your shitty “rErEaD aNd tHiNk” & “When Baylee loses to Makenzie Perry (sHe WoN’t bE gReEtEd WiTh oPeN aRmS)” AND then in the SAME response, you DENY you just bashed Baylee!!! Remember, it's all in writing for everyone to see.
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: And then you murder irony. After you PERSONALLY ATTACK a poster as 'intellectually deficient, undiscerning, and intellectually inept’ for simply asking you to defend your argument, YOU COMPLAIN about others “RESORTING TO PERSONAL ATTACKS”. And that’s a ‘false premise’ logical fallacy to boot- there were no. personal. attacks!
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: You perfectly demonstrate why you shouldn’t use AI to try to 'smarten' up' your arguments. You went from a 5th grade writing level a sentence ago, to a grad school dissertation, lol (which was a non-sequitur on top of that!).
You again made the logical fallacy of arguing an argument not made (aka false premise)- I didn’t make any claim about a straw man.
That you take issue with the term ‘word salad’ as a personal attack is comical.
Then you complain about profanity, another ‘false premise’, as there is no profanity. Showing your ass’ is a well-known Southern colloquial phrase for acting in a rude, obnoxious, or aberrant manner.
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Finally, I realize it was the ‘substantive arguments’ against your laughable ’That was not an opinion’ claim that triggered you to attack, but if you’re going to fuck around with stupid arguments, I will help you find out how stupid they are.
And if you fuck around and attack a poster as “intellectually deficient, undiscerning, and intellectually inept” because they called out on your bs ‘not opinion’, I’ll again help you find out, how stupid that is.
Author:
I can't bear the arrogance of the confidently incorrect.
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: I'm sorry if I seemed blunt, but my reply was based on how you talked to me. You seem to know who I am, so I'm curious: Who do you think I am? I can make a guess about your identity, but I don't have proof, so I won't say it.
